On that subject...
There's nothing like guaranteeing a negative... MORE
Just finished reading this very brief post on the... MORE
I read a Facebook comment about cutting federal... MORE
I can't even begin to say how relieved I am that... MORE
So I noticed that one of the hotter items being... MORE
I recently had the opportunity to review the work... MORE
"Don't reinvent the wheel." This is a phrase... MORE
I haven't said much (at least not publicly) about... MORE
Recently, I've been requested by a prospective... MORE
Have you ever watched an inexperienced manager... MORE
Mass Media: An ethical and socially acceptable... MORE
From OpinionJournal: "He's Got Two of 'Em" Oh... MORE
I’ve been watching web traffic from my desk here... MORE
Through my work with a number of public... MORE
After reading the Tuesday, March 6th edition of... MORE
Sorry to those of you who did not sign up for... MORE
For me, one of the highlights about last week's... MORE
"Billions of signals rush over the ocean floor... MORE
Still using the hell out of those colons in my... MORE
Someone at the Public Media Conference who made... MORE
Everyone knows how much I love public... MORE
You heard it here first. Or maybe not. But this... MORE
This press release and photo were just forwarded... MORE
OK, I admit this post might just be a bit of a... MORE
So I got this note from Brookstone after buying a... MORE
As my second installment of Web Master Tidbits, ... MORE
Here's one to watch. Microsoft Point of... MORE
It seems some other folks (including the New York... MORE
I had the pleasure of reading the recent blog... MORE
Flipboard, Zite, Msgboy, Pulse, Taptu, Poptart,... MORE
So I'm experimenting with a new social media... MORE
UPDATE as of 12PM EST: Facebook has apparently... MORE
I wonder if this means I won't have to help... MORE
Ever wonder what the links under the main Google... MORE
"What if I started a new public media web... MORE
So I don't have much time to write here, but this... MORE
My good friend John Tynan from KJZZ in Arizona... MORE
Remember Webmonkey? "The Web Developer's... MORE
This is my new favorite.It's the Washlet, and... MORE
I really am a pathetic blogger. Not sure why, but... MORE
I'm going to try something new here at... MORE
I have a CMS called MySiteWorx!, a software that... MORE
Recently I was interviewed by Stephen Feller from... MORE
I don't write a whole lot of HOWTO stuff on this... MORE
If you've never tried it, you might want to wait... MORE
When will they ever learn?
I've been watching the great and complicated irresolution (whether or not to charge for content) for several years now. My first exposure came while I was working as Web Manager for North Country Public Radio in Canton, NY. There was a stink in the air because it was getting difficult for many of the big city public radio stations to come up with enough money to pay for their live streams, and they needed ways to generate revenue - fast. Naturally, the inclination was to look for hidden opportunity.
"Well, guys...we need some dough."
"Where can we get some?"
"Wait...hey..I've got it!"
"Well, you know all that material we put online that people love to read and listen to and stuff?"
"OK. So they already use it, right?"
"So instead of giving it away, we can..."
"We can sell it!"
"Good thinking, right?"
"Well kind of. Except, they already get it for free...so why would they want to pay for it. I mean, really, we've already convinced them they have a right to get it for nothing. Now we've got to convince them it's a privelege worth paying for. This seems wholly illogical and will ultimately leave us with less traffic and result in our patrons mistrusting us."
"Oh. Okay. Well, let's do it anyway."
"Yeah. Good idea."
And so it went. About that same time, other folks were thinking the same thing, tried it, and failed. Good thing, too, because it gave some pubcasters a moment to pause and think about what they were getting into before they got into it. There's still a buzz about it now with the big NPR crowd, but it seems to dull by the day.
The thing I really don't get is why, when ad sales and values are up, does the New York Times need to start locking up portions of their news, keeping it only for those who can afford it?
There are a number of problems I see with this strategy:
- "Information wants to be free." Although they are a commercial organization, they do provide a Constitutionally protected service to our citizens. Our nation's fourth estate is key to our properly functioning democracy. For details, see any search engine for keywords, "What happens to democracy when public information is only to available to rich people", or some such thing.
- Online ad sales are up, most likely due in great part to the increasing value of internet traffic of all kinds. We are willing to pay for value. Reducing traffic to portions of your site seems to me a funny way of maintaining the value of your ad space. Maybe I'm missing something that much smarter folks see clearly.
- Visitors expect the content of your website to be available without limitation. To most visitors, the web is like a library. Putting a locked gate and a toll booth at the end of your driveway leaves visitors feeling unwelcome and excluded. That is, of course, unless they are exclusive members. Either way, the revenue to be gotten online does not come from "special delivery", it comes from "free delivery" of your product, in an ad-wrapped package.
Here's my recommendation for folks who want to make money online: Create something of value (the razor). Make it available to people who see the value clearly. Let them learn to depend on it. Now, when it's finally going well, turn that value into revenue by telling other folks that they can advertise in your space (the razor blade), to your visitors, who also see the value of your advertisers' products and services. Sell your content to the advertiser, not the visitor. Increase the value of your website by making your content essential and easily accessible. Sell razor blades, not razors.
Well, maybe I'm wrong. Without a doubt I'll be watching to see what happens next. Then I'll know for sure.