On that subject...
Flipboard, Zite, Msgboy, Pulse, Taptu, Poptart,... MORE
So I'm experimenting with a new social media... MORE
UPDATE as of 12PM EST: Facebook has apparently... MORE
I wonder if this means I won't have to help... MORE
Iíve been watching web traffic from my desk here... MORE
Ever wonder what the links under the main Google... MORE
"What if I started a new public media web... MORE
So I noticed that one of the hotter items being... MORE
I recently had the opportunity to review the work... MORE
So I don't have much time to write here, but this... MORE
My good friend John Tynan from KJZZ in Arizona... MORE
OK, I admit this post might just be a bit of a... MORE
Through my work with a number of public... MORE
Remember Webmonkey? "The Web Developer's... MORE
So I got this note from Brookstone after buying a... MORE
This is my new favorite.It's the Washlet, and... MORE
After reading the Tuesday, March 6th edition of... MORE
Sorry to those of you who did not sign up for... MORE
"Billions of signals rush over the ocean floor... MORE
Still using the hell out of those colons in my... MORE
Someone at the Public Media Conference who made... MORE
I really am a pathetic blogger. Not sure why, but... MORE
I'm going to try something new here at... MORE
As my second installment of Web Master Tidbits, ... MORE
I have a CMS called MySiteWorx!, a software that... MORE
Recently I was interviewed by Stephen Feller from... MORE
Everyone knows how much I love public... MORE
I don't write a whole lot of HOWTO stuff on this... MORE
Here's one to watch.† Microsoft Point of... MORE
It seems some other folks (including the New York... MORE
When will they ever learn? I've been watching... MORE
You heard it here first. Or maybe not. But this... MORE
Recently, I've been requested by a prospective... MORE
I had the pleasure of reading†the recent†blog... MORE
If you've never tried it, you might want to wait... MORE
There's nothing like guaranteeing a negative... MORE
Just finished reading this very brief post on the... MORE
I read a Facebook comment about cutting federal... MORE
I can't even begin to say how relieved I am that... MORE
"Don't reinvent the wheel." This is a phrase... MORE
I haven't said much (at least not publicly) about... MORE
Have you ever watched an inexperienced manager... MORE
From OpinionJournal: "He's Got Two of 'Em" Oh... MORE
Mass Media: An ethical and socially acceptable method of brainwashing Large Groups of People simultaneously, without all the mess
Yep. I have finally stumbled across the news story that has led to my ultimate definition of the media.
It's not that the story itself is so remarkable or exceptional. It's not that it hasn't been done before, or read before, or heard before. In fact, the Martha Stewart court case is nothing more than ordinary. It's just another public hanging.
So why, then, does this story tell me what I have been waiting to know? It's one simple statement that got me. Apparently the judge told the jurors in this very public trial that if they "see a headline, turn the page."
Why? Why would a judge say this to a group of people who are about to embark on the journey of delivering a final verdict?
Jurors are asked to listen to facts, questions, and statements about an issue. The issue is up for judgement, and someone has to decide, objectively, the outcome of that issue. It is important for the jurors to have the opportunity to form an opinion based on truth, on facts.
It is standard practice for jurors to be told that they are not to expose themselves to media reports regarding the cases they are hearing. The idea is, the media would tend to sway the jurors from the facts presented in the case. Each side of the argument is expected to have the opportunity to make the case with their own facts, so the jury might find the truth somewhere in there.
Granted, our legal system today leaves a bit to be desired at times when it comes to justice, but the point is, it is still all about truth, justice...and you know the rest.
Again, the question is, why can't jurors listen to a news story from CNN regarding their case? Why can't they read the paper as it presents an outside, objective point-of-view on the facts involved in the case? Shouldn't that help? Wouldn't it be better to know everything, to be exposed to as much truth as possible, to hear all sides of the story told from a different perspective, a perspective that reveres reality and open mindedness?
Because it doesn't. The newspaper is not outside. The radio is not objective. The television does not present the truth.
The internet is not honest, real or open-minded.
As I listen to the news this evening, I will remember the judge in the Martha case. I'll remember that if I want the facts, if I want the truth, if I want to form my own, honest opinion about the events of the world, based on reality, and formed with an open mind, I will not consult the media and all their spin-centered drama. I will remember that reality-TV is probably as real as it gets in the media. The rest is all...brainwashing.
I think I'll go for a walk.